No. 56 (2026)
Articles

Law, Religion, and Power: A Sociological Analysis of Symbolic Patriarchy in the Taliban’s New Penal Code (2026)

Juan Jose Soza Herrera
Universidad de San Martín de Porres. Lima. Perú

Published 2026-06-18

Keywords

  • Criminal law,
  • Religion and politics,
  • Patriarchy,
  • Symbolic violence,
  • Social control

How to Cite

Soza Herrera, J. J. (2026). Law, Religion, and Power: A Sociological Analysis of Symbolic Patriarchy in the Taliban’s New Penal Code (2026). Revista Sarance, 56, 79-102. https://doi.org/10.51306/ioasarance.056.05

Share

Abstract

This article sociologically examines the new penal code enacted under the Taliban regime, focusing on the intersections of law, religion, and power as producers and sources of legitimacy for the social order. Engaging in interdisciplinary work that integrates the sociology of law, Foucault’s theory of power, Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic violence, and gender studies, the author argues that the penal code should be considered not only as a set of technical legal norms, but also as a political-legal instrument that establishes institutionalized relations of patriarchal domination.

This study illustrates how the religious interpretation of Shari’a and state authority intertwine to produce a dual legitimizing system—coercive and symbolic—that regulates behavior, subjectivities, and social hierarchies. The analysis observes the social control of the female body, conceptualized as a political space where social discipline, moral regulation, and state sovereignty are inscribed. Through provisions regarding freedom of movement, education, public participation, and social roles, the law contributes to gender construction in and through a legal framework, as well as to the legitimization of structural inequalities.

The article also analyzes whether the Taliban penal order represents a political construction of religion or whether it constitutes a fully religious expression. It concludes that both variants have historically intertwined in processes of hegemonic construction.

Finally, the work concludes that the Taliban penal code functions as a symbolic and normative architecture that reorganizes the social order through the institutionalization of patriarchy, revealing the role of law as a technology of power and a producer of subjectivities in contemporary political contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. An-Na’im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the secular state: Negotiating the future of Shari’a. Harvard University Press.
  2. Ardakani, M. A., y Seifabadi, M. S. (2025). The feasibility of matching the Taliban’s Sharia-based order with Davis’s theory of the sacred society. Social Evolution & History, 24(1), 113-146. https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2025.01.06
  3. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press.
  4. Billaud, J. (2020). Islamic law, gender politics, and legal subjectivity in contemporary governance. Journal of Legal Anthropology.
  5. Bustamante, C. B. (2013). Michel Foucault’s philosophy of bio-power and the construction of the human subject. Philippiniana Sacra. https://doi.org/10.55997/ps1006xlix143a5
  6. Coronel Tarancón, A. (2023). Rethinking biopolitics in the Anthropocene: Foucault, Esposito, and the political physiology of social metabolisms. Res Publica. https://doi.org/10.5209/rpub.85500
  7. Costello, K., Weng, C., y Sullivan, D. (2022). The reproduction of gendered inequalities through symbolic systems. Social Psychological Review.
  8. de Alwis, R. S. (2024). Holding the Taliban accountable for gender persecution. German Law Journal. https://doi. org/10.1017/glj.2023.113
  9. Feldman, N. (2008). The fall and rise of the Islamic state. Princeton University Press.
  10. Galantin, D. V., y Ribas, T. F. (2022). Biopolitics and (in)security in Foucault: Elements for a diagnosis of the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Revista de Filosofia Aurora, 34(61), 153-173.
  11. Gloor, J. L., Morf, M., y Akin, A. (2023). Institutionalized patriarchy: How organizations reproduce gender hierarchies. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(3), 768-796.
  12. Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Shari’a: Theory, practice, transformations. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Kadir, M. A. A., y Nurhaliza, S. (2023). State responsibility of Afghanistan under Taliban regime. Jurnal Media Hukum, 30(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v30i1.16020
  14. Kaur, P. (2021). Gender inequality in contemporary society: a social justice framework for analysis and intervention. National Research Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(1), 38-48.
  15. Ludwig, G. (2020). Body politics and democracy. Constellations. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12473
  16. Macdonald, M. N., y Hunter, D. (2018). Biopolitics, governmentality and the banopticon. En The discourse of security. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97193-3_6
  17. Malik, T., Jan, F., y Ullah, Z. (2023). The epistemicide in Afghanistan: An analysis of Taliban’s policies towards national and cultural symbols. LASSIJ. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/7.2.4
  18. McLaren, M. A., y Rajat, S. (2025). Biopolitics and reproductive injustice. Revista Ideação. https://doi.org/10.13102/ ideac.v1i51.11836
  19. Omirzhanov, Y., Ghyasi, M., y Bertayeva, B. (2023). Taliban’s misconception of Islamic law in treatment with women rights. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(5), 122-131. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjhss.2023.v08i05.004
  20. Powell, E. J., y Paldino, J. (2025). The Taliban, Afghan constitutionalism and modern Islamic law states. Global Constitutionalism, 14(3), 596-623. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045381725000048
  21. Rahmany, A. (2025). Youth in crossfire: Political motives behind the Taliban’s ban on women’s education. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(3), 1-12. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/3/48116.pdf
  22. Roy, O. (2004). Globalized Islam: The search for a new ummah. Columbia University Press.
  23. Singh, G. (2024). Identifying the legitimacy of the Taliban government and the resurrection of peace in Afghanistan. Groningen Journal of International Law, 10(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.21827/grojil.10.2.103-118
  24. Valverde, M. (2011). Seeing like a city: The dialectic of modern and premodern ways of seeing in urban governance. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 277–312.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00441.x
  25. Wadud, A. (2022). Reinterpreting Islamic jurisprudence through an egalitarian lens: Contributions of Islamic feminism. Journal of Islamic Studies.
  26. Yusufzai, A., Geeta, G., y Kataria, G. (2024). Taliban discrimination against women: Comprehensive analysis of main factors. Kutafin Law Review, 11(4), 685–717. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2024.4.30.685-717