No. 44 (2020)
Articles

Limited factors in access to higher education in indigenous communities of Otavalo

César Alfredo Laso Bonilla
Universidad de Otavalo. Otavalo. Ecuador
Edison David Cachimuel Anrango
Universidad de Otavalo. Otavalo. Ecuador

Published 2020-06-03

Keywords

  • community,
  • access,
  • higher education,
  • public policy

How to Cite

Laso Bonilla, C. A., & Cachimuel Anrango, E. D. . (2020). Limited factors in access to higher education in indigenous communities of Otavalo. Revista Sarance, 44, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.51306/

Share

Abstract

In Ecuador a higher education access has been a political challenge to date for government. Despite governmental interventions to raise rankings on this field, Indigenous and Afro-descendant have had lower university enrollment rate. The research objective is driven to undergraduate university enrolment limitations in indigenous communities such as: Cotama, Guanansi and San José which are located in Otavalo Canton. The research methodology was quantitative, furthermore; a survey was applied. The results show that high school graduate students’ aspirations to get a college education have been reduce dramatically due to factors like the number of siblings, economic situation (low incomes), Ecuadorian’s colleges allocation system which students refuse, and low performance in National Exams by Higher Education (academic aptitude test), arranged by the National Secretary of Science and Technology (Senescyt) to get a public university admition. Finally, the results were analyzed by University staff members in order to find mechanisms that help high school undergraduate students to access higher education to make ensure better living conditions for these people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Arcos, C., & Vásconez, A. (2001). El Bachillerato en Ecuador: Eficiencia, equidad y retornos. Flacso.
  2. Becker, G. S., Mincer, J., & Schultz, T. W. (2007). Capital humano: Una mirada desde la educación y la experiencia laboral. Cuadernos de investigación, 22-25.
  3. Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Registro oficial 449.
  4. Cuji, L. (2010). Decisiones, omisiones y contradicciones: La interculturalidad en la reforma de la educación superior en Ecuador (pp. 76-81).
  5. El Telégrafo. (2015, 15 de febrero). http://tinyurl.com/oacpky9
  6. González, P. (2006). La educación superior, ¿un bien público? Editorial Santa María.
  7. Guaján, B. (2014). Mujeres Kichwas: Entre el racismo y el sexismo en universidades privadas de Quito [Tesis de maestría, FLACSO].
  8. Hueso, A., & Josep, M. J. (2012). Metodología y técnicas cuantitativas de investigación. Editorial Universidad Politécnica Valenciana.
  9. León, M. (2002). Educación desigual: Mecanismo de transmisión intergeneracional de la pobreza. Secretaría Técnica del Frente Social.
  10. Muñoz, T. G. (2003). El cuestionario como instrumento de investigación/evaluación. http://cvonline.uaeh.edu.mx/Cursos/Maestria/MTE/Gen02/seminario_de_tesis/Unidad_4_anterior/Lect_El_Cuestionario.pdf
  11. Ponce, J., & Carrasco, F. (s. f.). Educación superior y posgrado en Ecuador. Flacso. http://www.uasb.edu.ec/documents/10181/1204037