No. 51 (2023)
Articles

The republic of letters, presentism and the dialogue between history and the social sciences

PDF (Spanish) ePUB (Spanish) TXT (Spanish)
  • Peter Burke
Peter Burke
Universidad de Cambridge. Emmanuel College. Inglaterra
Bio

Published 2023-12-04

Keywords

  • presentism,
  • republic of letters,
  • history of concepts,
  • phronesis

Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Burke

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Burke, P. . (2023). The republic of letters, presentism and the dialogue between history and the social sciences . Revista Sarance, 51, 9-39. https://doi.org/10.51306/ioasarance.051.02

Share

Abstract

This article offers a contribution to a public conversation about the future of the social sciences and the humanities. The concept of a ‘public conversation’ is modelled on the traditional idea of the ‘Republic of Letters’, updated for the 21st century. The article suggests that what historians have to contribute to this international and interdisciplinary conversation is the critique of ‘presentism’, in other words the ‘retreat into the present’ (ignoring the influence of the past on the present) denounced by the sociologist Norbert Elias half a century ago and more recently by the historian François Hartog. To correct presentism the article advocates Reinhart Koselleck’s conceptual history, in order to make social scientists more aware that the concepts with which they think are inherited from the past and change over time. It recommends combining this history with the ‘phronetic’ approach of the economic geographer Bent Flybjerg, making use of knowledge for social action. 

PDF (Spanish) ePUB (Spanish) TXT (Spanish)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Akil Reed, A. (2021). The words that made us: America’s constitutional conversation, 1760-1840. Basic Books.
  2. Armitage, D. (2003). In defense of presentism. In D. McMahon (Ed.), History and human flourishing (pp. 25-41). Oxford University Press.
  3. Assmann, A. (2012). Is time out of joint? On the rise and fall of the modern time regime. Cornell University Press.
  4. Baschet, J. (2018). Défaire la tyrannie du présent. La Découverte.
  5. Boldt, A. (2015). The life and work of the German historian Leopold von Ranke (1795-1886): An assessment of his achievement. New York University Press.
  6. Braudel, F. (1958). Histoire et sciences sociales: La longue durée. Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 13(4), 725-753.
  7. Brown, P. (2012). Through the eye of a needle: Wealth, the fall of Rome, and the making of Christianity in the West. Princeton University Press.
  8. Burke, P. (2006). Triumphs and poverties of anachronism. Scientia Poetica, 10, 291-298.
  9. Burke, P. (2012). The Republic of Letters as a communication system. Media History, 18(1), 1-13
  10. Chakrabarty, D. (2018). Anthropocene time. History and Theory, 57(1), 5-32.
  11. Chakrabarty, D. (2021). The climate of history in a planetary age. University of Chicago Press.
  12. Den Boer, P. (1987). History as a profession: The study of history in France, 1818-1914. Princeton University Press.
  13. Descola, P. (2005). Par-delà nature et culture. Gallimard.
  14. Elias, N. (1987). The retreat of sociologists into the present. Teoría, Cultura y Sociedad, 4(2), 223-247.
  15. Fernández Sebastián, J. (2021). Historia conceptual en el Atlántico ibérico: Lenguajes, tiempos, revoluciones. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  16. Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., y Schram, S. (Eds.). (2012). Real social science. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The theatre state in 19th-century Bali. Princeton University Press.
  18. Greenwood Onuf, N. (1998). The Republican legacy in international thought. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Habermas, J. (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Polity Press.
  20. Hallerma, J. (2022). Negotiating presentism. Rethinking History, 24(4), 442-446.
  21. Hartog, F. (2003). Régimes d’historicité: Présentisme et expériences du temps. Seuil.
  22. Hartog, F. (2021). Chronos, kairos, krisis. History and Theory, 60(4), 425-439.
  23. Hunt, L. (2002, 21 de mayo). Against presentism. Perspectives on History. https://www.historians.org/perspectives-article/against-presentism-may-2002/
  24. Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past. Columbia University Press.
  25. Koselleck, R., E. Mayr, H. A. Biedenkopf, y H. D. Hohenberg (Eds.). (1972/1997). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Klett-Cotta.
  26. Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. La Découverte.
  27. Lingelbach, G. (2011). The institutionalization and professionalization of history in Europe and the United States. In S. Macintyre, J. Maiguashca, y A. Pók (Eds.), Oxford history of historical writing (Vol. 4, pp. 78-96). Oxford University Press.
  28. Loraux, N. (1993). Éloge de l’anachronisme en histoire. Le Genre Humain, 27, 23-39.
  29. Lorenz, C. (2019). Out of time? Some critical reflections on François Hartog’s presentism. In M. Tamm y L. Olivier (Eds.), Rethinking historical time: New approaches to presentism (pp. 50-80). Bloomsbury.
  30. Lowenthal, D. (2015). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Mallon, F. (1994). The promise and dilemma of subaltern studies: Perspectives from Latin American history. American Historical Review, 99(5), 1491-1515.
  32. Martí, J. (2023). Nuevas herramientas conceptuales para un mundo que cambia: El posthumanismo. Revista Sarance, (50), 80-114.
  33. McDonald, T. (Ed.). (1996). The historic turn in the human sciences. University of Michigan Press.
  34. Mintz, S. (1985). Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in modern history. Viking.
  35. Monje, C. (2011). Cafés y clubes. En J. Borja Gómez y P. Rodríguez Jiménez (Eds.), Historia de la vida privada en Colombia (pp. 67-85). Taurus.
  36. Moore, B. (1984). Privacy: Studies in social and cultural history. Routledge.
  37. Mudrovic, M. (2021). Regimes of historicity. En Bloomsbury history: Theory and method. Bloomsbury.
  38. Nora, P. (1984). Les lieux de mémoire. Gallimard.
  39. Patrick, H. (2016). The memory phenomenon in contemporary historical writing. Palgrave Macmillan.
  40. Phillips, M. (2013). On historical distance. Yale University Press.
  41. Pincus, S. (1995). “Coffee politicians does create”: Coffee-houses and Restoration political culture. Journal of Modern History, 67(4), 807-834.
  42. Rodríguez Estrada, D. (2023). Editorial. Revista Sarance, (50), 5-8.
  43. Rosa, H. (2005). Aceleración social: A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press.
  44. Sahlins, M. (1985). Islands of history. University of Chicago Press.
  45. Salerno, G. (2023). El colapso y sus metainterpretaciones/ L’effondrement et ses métainterprétations. Revista Sarance, (50), 40-79.
  46. Simon, Z. (2021). Domesticating the future through history. Time and Society, 30(3), 494-516.
  47. Tamm, M., y Olivier, L. (Eds.). (2019). Rethinking historical time: New approaches to presentism. Bloomsbury.