No. 49 (2022): "Delusions of Race and Everydayness. Memory, Reconciliation, Bodies and Violence in Daily Life"
Articles

Indigenous Art: From Appreciation to Art Criticism

David Garneau
Universidad de Regina. Artes visuales. Regina. Canadá
Bio

Published 2022-12-12

Keywords

  • Indigenous art,
  • Aboriginal art,
  • art criticism,
  • appreciation,
  • artistic institutions

How to Cite

Garneau, D. (2022). Indigenous Art: From Appreciation to Art Criticism . Revista Sarance, 49, 69-85. https://doi.org/10.51306/ioasarance.049.04

Share

Abstract

“Indigenous Art: From Appreciation to Art Criticism” begins with Australian Aboriginal artist Vernon Ah Kee’s complaint that no one writes critically about his art. His claim recognizes that contemporary art, that is art that participates in international art discourses and institutions, only completely achieves this status when it is engaged critically. The failure to attract such criticism leaves Aboriginal art, as a class, out of the top sphere of the art world. This resistance may be due to institutional racism: the dominant culture refuses to recognize Aboriginal art as contemporary art. Or, perhaps the work is so advanced and different from the dominant modes that it cannot be fully apprehended by current critical writers and their worldviews. Until recently, Aboriginal art was appreciated as beautiful and interesting by collectors but institutions recognized it less as art than as works of culture. Such works were more often relegated to museums as anthropological items than displayed in art galleries as art.  

To avoid significant misreading and misuse, it is important to distinguish between Aboriginal art and Indigenous art. Aboriginal art is either customary art or art designed for non-Aboriginal appreciation but that does not engage international art world discourses and institutions. Indigenous art is a new class of works that do engage international art world discourses and institutions. A crucial requirement of which is writing that shows how that art work so participates. With the rise of Indigenous artists working in non-customary styles and content, and the rise of Indigenous curation, some of this art is clearly contemporary art and, as a requirement of status, needs to be written about critically. If non-Indigenous writers are unwilling or unable to so engage, Indigenous contemporary artists need a new generation of Indigenous critics of Indigenous art. However, they also could use ally writers who perform non-colonially by learning how to “read” and write about this work. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bell, R. (2007). Richard Bell: Positivity. Institute of Modern Art.
  2. Danto, A. C. (1974). The transfiguration of the commonplace. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 33(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/429082
  3. Elkins, J. (1996). Why are our pictures puzzles? Some thoughts on writing excessively. New Literary History, 27(2), 271-290.
  4. McLean, I. A. (2011). Aboriginal art and the artworlds. En I. A. McLean (Ed.), How Aborigines invented the idea of contemporary art: A documentary history 1980-2006 (pp. 17-76). IMA and Power Publications.
  5. Moore, A. (2006). Black eye = black viewpoint: A conversation with ProppaNow. Machine, 1(4), 38–41.
  6. Perkins, H., & Browning, D. (2012). A place of our own. Artlink, 32(2), 26–29.
  7. Radok, S. (2012). Making history. Artlink, 32(2), 40–43.
  8. Tillers, I. (2011). A conversation with Ian North. En I. McLean (Ed.), How Aborigines invented the idea of contemporary art (pp. 307–311). Institute of Modern Art & Power Publications.
  9. Young, A. (2012). The buckskin ceiling: A native perspective on native art politics. Aboriginal Issues Press.