No. 18 (1993)
Articles

Identity is a policy and not an inheritance

José Echeverría Almeida
Instituto Otavaleño de Antropología. Otavalo. Ecuador

Published 2021-05-07

Keywords

  • political identity,
  • cultural heritage,
  • integrated cultural logic,
  • social action,
  • ethnic consciousness

How to Cite

Echeverría Almeida, . J. (2021). Identity is a policy and not an inheritance. Revista Sarance, 18, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.51306/

Share

Abstract

This article explores the complexities of identity and politics in Ecuador, highlighting the interaction between hegemonic and subaltern cultures. It questions the anthropological nostalgia for the “authentic” and examines how identity is formed through historical and social processes, where tradition and modernity coexist in an integrated cultural logic. Identity is not static, but is constantly reinvented, revealing the past while constructing the present. The article emphasizes that ethnic consciousness arises from social action and is not limited to external aspects, such as clothing or customs, but is deeply linked to the struggle for common goals. In addition, it analyzes the possibility of maintaining a national identity while respecting ethnic and linguistic diversity, and discusses the ambiguities of the State in the construction of a plurinational and multiethnic nation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
  2. Bakhtin, M., & Holquist, M. (Eds.). (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  3. Bonfil Batalla, G. (1987). México profundo: Una civilización negada. México D.F.: Secretaría de Educación Pública / CIESAS.
  4. De Lauretis, T. (1987). The technology of gender. En Technologies of gender: Essays on theory and practice (pp. 1-30). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  5. Foucault, M. (1990). El sujeto y el poder. En Política: Teoría y métodos (pp. 87-110).
  6. Gluckman, M. (1978). Política, derecho y ritual en la sociedad tribal. Madrid: Akal.
  7. Gow, P. (1991). Of mixed blood: Kinship and history in Peruvian Amazonia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  8. Gow, P. (1991). Drunken speech and the construction of meaning: Bilingual competence in the southern Peruvian Andes. Language in Society, 20(1), 1-36.
  9. Hill, J., & Hill, K. (1986). Speaking Mexicano. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  10. Hobsbawm, E. (n.d.). Inventando tradiciones. Historias, (19), 3-15.
  11. Hornberger, N. H. (1991). Bilingual education success, but policy failure. Language in Society, 16(2), 205-225.
  12. Jiménez, J. L. (1989). Cultura, ideología y democidio. En F. Rojas Aravena (Ed.), América Latina: Ideología y cultura (pp. 51-82). San José: Editorial EUNED.
  13. Sánchez-Parga, J. (1989). Faccionalismo, ideología y proyecto étnico en los Andes. Quito: CAAP.
  14. Sánchez-Parga, J. (1990). Etnia, poder y diferencia en los Andes. Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.
  15. Smith, G. (1989). Livelihood and resistance: Peasants and the politics of land in Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  16. Strathern, M. (1992). After nature: Kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Taussig, M. (1992). The nervous system. New York: Routledge.
  18. Toren, C. (1988). Making the present, revealing the past: The mutability and continuity of tradition as process. Man, 23, 696-717.