No. 54 (2025): Vulnerability: bodies, violence and care from the perspective of Social Sciences and Humanities
Articles

Unraveled and Entangled: A Posthumanist Perspective on Bodies

ePUB (Spanish) PDF (Spanish) TXT (Spanish)
  • Josep Martí
Josep Martí
Instituto Catalán de Antropología. Barcelona. Spain

Published 2025-06-17

Keywords

  • body,
  • posthumanism,
  • agency,
  • relationality,
  • affect

Copyright (c) 2025 Josep Martí

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Martí, J. . (2025). Unraveled and Entangled: A Posthumanist Perspective on Bodies. Revista Sarance, 54, 29-51. https://doi.org/10.51306/ioasarance.054.03

Share

Abstract

This article presents several ideas from posthumanist thought regarding the body. In seeking to understand reality by overcoming conceptual schemes of Cartesian dualism, anthropocentrism, and biocentrism, the posthumanist notion of the body is built upon assumptions from those of humanism. It does not conceive the body as a mere vessel for the mind, but instead begins from the notion of embodiment— interpreted in a broader sense as it was originally formulated by Thomas Csordas. The body is conceptualized as an assemblage of different elements, comprehensible only through intra actions (Karen Barad) with the surrounding world —contrary to the classical vision that considers the body as a unified organic whole, separated from its environment. As Donna Haraway asserts, the body extends beyond the skin. In this way, the boundaries of the body —so clearly established by epistemological structures deeply shaped by anthropocentric dualities such as individual/society and mind/body dualities—are blurred within the conceptual framework of posthumanism. In the nondualist ontology central to posthumanism, it is relations—not discrete entities—that matter. The body is thus understood not it terms of what it is, but in terms of what it can do— its capacities for action and interaction (Gilles Deleuze).

ePUB (Spanish) PDF (Spanish) TXT (Spanish)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ahearn, L. M. (2010). Agency and language. In J. Jaspers, J. Ostman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Society and language use (pp. 28-48). John Benjamins.
  2. Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259-264). MIT Press.
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  4. Bateson, G. (1976). Pasos hacia una ecología de la mente. Lohlé.
  5. Baudrillard, J. (1969). El sistema de los objetos. Siglo XXI.
  6. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
  7. Blackman, L., & Venn, C. (2010). Affect. Body & Society, 16(1), 7-28.
  8. Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. University of Minnesota Press.
  9. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. En J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). Routledge.
  10. Clarkson, M. (2010). The secret life of Glenn Gould: A genius in love. ECW Press.
  11. Coleman, R. (2008). The becoming of bodies. Feminist Media Studies, 8(2), 163-179.
  12. Coleman, R. (2013). Transforming images: Screens, affect, futures. Routledge.
  13. Colman, F. J. (2010). Affect. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (2nd ed., pp. 11-14). Edinburgh University Press.
  14. Csordas, T. (1999). Embodiment and cultural phenomenology. In G. Weiss & H. F. Haber (Eds.), Perspectives on embodiment: The intersections of nature and culture (pp. 143-162). Routledge.
  15. DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
  16. Deleuze, G. (1962). Nietzsche et la philosophie. Presses Universitaires de France.
  17. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux. Editions de Minuit.
  18. Domínguez Rubio, F. (2008). La cuestión del objeto como cuestión sociológica. En T. Sánchez-Criado (Ed.), Tecnogénesis: La construcción técnica de las ecologías humanas (Vol. 1, pp. 81-111). AIBR.
  19. Domínguez Rubio, F. (2016). On the discrepancy between objects and things: an ecological approach. Journal of Material Culture, 21(1), 59-86.
  20. Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology. Columbia University Press.
  21. Esposito, R. (2015). Persons and things: From the body’s point of view. Polity Press.
  22. Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: Differences and relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26-32.
  23. Fox, N. J. (2011). The ill-health assemblage: Beyond the body-with-organs. Health Sociology Review, 20(4), 359-371.
  24. Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399-414.
  25. Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Clarendon Press.
  26. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity Press.
  27. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
  28. Ihde, D. (2004). Los cuerpos en la tecnología. Nuevas tecnologías: nuevas ideas acerca de nuestro cuerpo. Editorial UOC.
  29. Krause, S. R. (2011). Bodies in action: Corporeal agency and democratic politics. Political Theory, 39(3), 299-324.
  30. Law, J. & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on Materiality and Sociality. The Sociological Review, 43, 274-294.
  31. Leeuw, S. E. van der (2008). Agency, Networks, Past and Future.En C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds), Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer (pp.217-247).
  32. Latour, B. (2014). Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History, 45(1), 1-18.
  33. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1965). El totemismo en la actualidad. FCE.
  34. McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT Press.
  35. Malafouris, L. (2008). Between brains, bodies and things: Tectonoetic awareness and the extended self. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363(1499), 1993-2002.
  36. Martí, J. (2016). Cuerpo, sociedad y agencia: Anorexia nervosa y blanqueamiento de piel. In J. Martí & L. Porzio (Eds.), Cuerpos y agencia en la arena social (pp.39-60). CSIC.
  37. Mazzei, L. A. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732-740.
  38. Miah, A. (2009). A critical history of posthumanism. In B. Gordijn & R. Chadwick (Eds.), Medical enhancement and posthumanity (pp. 71-94). Springer Netherlands.
  39. Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and actornetworks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass, 9(1), 27-41.
  40. Pedersen, M. A. (2007). Multiplicity without myth: Theorizing Darhad perspectivism. Inner Asia, 9(2), 311- 328.
  41. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press.
  42. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2009). Touching technologies, touching visions: The reclaim of sensorial experience and the politics of speculative thinking. Subjectivity, 28, 297-315.
  43. Sánchez Moreno, I. (2008). Cuando los Beatles se fueron de viaje, Glenn Gould se convirtió en piano. In T. Sánchez-Criado (Ed.), Tecnogénesis: La construcción técnica de las ecologías humanas (Vol. 1, pp. 139-172). AIBR.
  44. Sharon, T. (2014). Human nature in an age of biotechnology: The case for mediated posthumanism. Springer.
  45. Shouse, E. (2005). Feeling, emotion, affect. M/C Journal 8(6). https: //doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2443 [consulta: febrero de 2017].
  46. Simondon, G. (1989). Du monde d’existence des objects techniques. Aubier.
  47. Springwood, C. F. (2014). Gun concealment, display, and other magical habits of the body. Critique of Anthropology, 34(4), 450-471.
  48. Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. Vintage.
  49. Thrift, N. (2000). Still life in nearly present time. Body & Society, 6(3-4), 34-57.
  50. Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, 86B(1), 55-76.
  51. Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Routledge.
  52. Welsch, W. (2014). Hombre y mundo: Filosofía en perspectiva evolucionista. Pre-textos.
  53. Westerman, F. (2006). El Negro. Eine verstörende Begegnung. Links.
  54. Wise, J. M. (2005). Assemblage. In C. J. Stivale (Ed.), Gilles Deleuze: Key concepts (pp.77-87). Acumen.
  55. Wolfe, C. (2009). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.