No. 52 (2024): "Begin Human in Nature. Anthropocene and social sciences"
Articles

Towards a new knowledge regime in the Anthropocene. The contribution from anthropology

Thomas Hylland Eriksen
Universidad de Oslo. Departamento de Antropología Social. Oslo. Noruega
Bio

Published 2024-06-18

Keywords

  • Anthropocene,
  • interdisciplinarity,
  • overheating,
  • anthropology

How to Cite

Hylland Eriksen, T. (2024). Towards a new knowledge regime in the Anthropocene. The contribution from anthropology . Revista Sarance, 52, 43-88. https://doi.org/10.51306/ioasarance.052.03

Share

Abstract

The world is overheated, global civilization has painted itself into a corner and negotiates an uncomfortable double-bind between growth imperatives and an urgent need for sustainable solutions. It is widely agreed today that these challenges urgently need to be taken seriously in research, political mobilization and policy making. The question is what kind of knowledge is needed for the appropriate steps to be taken. The short answer is: Many kinds of knowledge. A longer answer begins with a follow-up question: Which knowledges? Using the concept and metaphor of overheating to explain the contemporary impasse, this contribution shows the importance of interdisciplinarity and asks to what extent the knowledge produced in anthropology can contribute to the kind of enlightenment which is needed. Should we learn from past mistakes and successes, seek the necessary insights from the remaining small-scale societies, or instead insist that modernity has to solve its contradictions through its own means, whether that means some kind of global government or technological solutions?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Barber, B. (1995). Jihad versus McWorld: How Globalism and Tribalism are Reshaping the World. Ballantine.
  2. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity.
  3. Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk. Polity.
  4. Baer, H. (2020). Airplanes, the Environment, and the Human Condition. Routledge.
  5. Baer, H. A. y Singer, M. (2018) The Anthropology of Climate Change: An Integrated Critical Perspective. Earthscan at Routledge.
  6. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell.
  7. Crate, S. A. y Nuttall, M. (Eds.) (2009). Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions. Left Coast Press
  8. Engelke, P. y McNeill, J. (2016). The Great Acceleration. Harvard University Press.
  9. Eriksen, T. H. (2014). Globalization: The Key Concepts. Bloomsbury.
  10. Eriksen, T. H. (2016). Overheating: An Anthropology of Accelerated Change. Pluto
  11. Eriksen, T. H. (Ed.) (2018). An Overheated World. Routledge.
  12. Eriksen, T. H. y Hessen, D. (1999). Egoisme (‘Selfishness’). Aschehoug.
  13. Eriksen, T. H. y Schober, E. (Eds.) (2016). Identities Destabilised: Living in an Overheated World. Pluto.
  14. Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, Movement, Life, Redes. Duke University Press.
  15. Hann, C. y Hart, K. (2011). Economic Anthropology: History, ethnography, critique. Polity.
  16. Hendry, J. (2014). Science and Sustainability: Learning from Indigenous Wisdom. Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Hessen, D. y Eriksen, T. H. (2012). På stedet løp: Om konkurranse i natur og kultur (‘The treadmill paradox: On competition in nature and culture’). Aschehoug.
  18. Hoffman, S; Hylland, T y Mendes, P. (Eds.) (2020). Cooling Down. Berghahn.
  19. Hornborg, A. (2019). Nature, Society and Justice in the Anthropocene: Unravelling the Money-Energy-Technology Complex. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La Pensée sauvage. Plon.
  21. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1983). Le Regard éloigné. Plon.
  22. Malthus, T. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population. J. Johnson.
  23. Mishra, P. (2017). The Age of Anger: A History of the Present. Straus and Giroux.
  24. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Belknap Press.
  25. Ritzer, G. (2004). The Globalization of Nothing. Sage
  26. Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp.
  27. Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions. Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Belknap Press.
  28. Scranton, R. (2015). Learning to Die in the Anthropocene: Reflections on the End of a Civilization. City Light Books.
  29. Shore, C. y Trnka, S. (Eds.) (2013). Up Close and Personal: On Peripheral Perspectives and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge. Berghahn.
  30. Snow, C. P. (2019). The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Sörlin, S. (2017). Antropocen. En essä om människans tidsalder. Weylers.
  32. Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. y McNeill, J. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are Human Beings Now Overwhelming the Forces of Nature?. AMBIO, 36(8), 614-21.
  33. Stensrud, A. B. y Eriksen, T. H. (Eds.) (2019). Climate, Capitalism and Communities. Pluto.
  34. Strathern, M. (1992). After Nature. English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Tainter, J. A. (1988). The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Tainter, J. A. (2008). Collapse and Sustainability: Rome, the Maya, and the Modern World. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 24.
  37. Vetlesen, A. J. (2020). Cosmologies of the Anthropocene. Routledge.
  38. Wallerstein, I, et al. (1996). Open the Social Sciences. Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford University Press.