Más allá de la igualdad y la discriminación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51306/ioasarance.054.02Palabras clave:
vulnerabilidad, relacionalidad, instituciones sociales, resilienciaResumen
El marco social de las personas “económicamente desfavorecidas” se basa en la distinción entre un estatus conceptual de igualdad y la realidad de la discriminación y la desventaja. Este paradigma proporciona la lógica que rige tanto la crítica como la justificación del statu quo. Este artículo se pregunta si, y en qué medida, esta lógica de igualdad/antidiscriminación ha perdido su eficacia como herramienta crítica y cuál debería ser, de ser el caso, el fundamento de la lógica que la complemente o incluso la sustituya.
Descargas
Referencias
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
Alperovitz, G., & Daly, L. (2008). Unjust deserts: How the rich are taking our common inheritance. New Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: Autonomy vs. control. Yale University Press.
Dinner, D. (2017). Beyond “best practices”: Employment-discrimination law in the neoliberal era. Indiana Law Journal, 92(4), 1059–1114.
Fineman, J. W. (2018). A vulnerability approach to private ordering employment. In M. A. Fineman & J. W. Fineman (Eds.), Vulnerability and the legal organization of work(pp. 13–30). Routledge.
Fineman, M. A. (1995a). Masking dependency: The political role of family rhetoric.Virginia Law Review, 81(7),2181–2216.
Fineman, M. A. (1995b). The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. Routledge.
Fineman, M. A. (2000). Cracking the foundational myths: Independence, autonomy, and selfsufficiency. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 8(1),13–29.
Fineman, M. A. (2001). Contract and care. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 76(3), 1403–1422.
Fineman, M. A. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 1–23.
Fineman, M. A. (2010). The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal, 60(2), 251–275.
Fineman, M. A. (2011). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. In M. A. Fineman (Ed.), Transcending boundaries of law: Generations of feminism and legal theory (pp. 161–176). Routledge.
Fineman, M. A. (2012). Beyond identities: The limits of an antidiscrimination approach to equality. Boston University Law Review, 92(5), 1713–1740.
Fineman, M. A. (2013). Equality, autonomy, and the vulnerable subject in law and politics. In M. A. Fineman & A. Grear (Eds.), Vulnerability: Reflections on a new ethical foundation for law and politics (pp. 13–28). Ashgate.
Fineman, M. A. (2014). Equality and difference– The restrained state.Alabama Law Review, 66(3), 609–626.
Fineman, M. A. (2014). Vulnerability, resilience, and LGBT youth. Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, 23(2), 307-331.
Fineman, M. A., & Shepherd, G. B. (2016). Homeschooling: Choosing parental rights over children’s interests. University of Baltimore Law Review, 46(1), 57–106.
Fineman, M. A. (2017). Vulnerability and inevitable inequality. Oslo Law Review, 4(3), 133–149.
Fineman, M. A., & Dougherty, T. (Eds.). (2005). Feminism confronts Homo Economicus: Gender, law, & society. Cornell University Press.
Fineman, M. A., & Shepherd, G. (2016). Homeschooling: Choosing parental rights over children’s interests.University of Baltimore Law Review, 46(1), 57–88.
Halley, J. (2011a). What is family law? A genealogy. Part I.Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 23(1), 1–6.
Halley, J. (2011b). What is family law? A genealogy. Part II.Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 23(2), 189–195.
Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2011). Winner-takeall politics: How Washington made the rich richer—and turned its back on the middle class. Simon & Schuster.
Kirby, P. (2006). Vulnerability and violence: The impact of globalisation. Pluto Press.
Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political economic systems. Basic Books.
Merton, R. K. (1967). On sociological theories of the middle range. In On theoretical sociology: Five essays, old and new (pp.39–72). Free Press.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law (9th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Rodgers, D. T. (2011). Age of fracture. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The Guardian. (2013, 8 de abril). Margaret Thatcher: A life in quotes. https: //www. theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/08/margaret-thatcher-quotes
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Martha Fineman
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores y autoras conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, los parámetros se establecen en nuestra Política Editorial .
La Revista Sarance no aplica ninguna tarifa por procesamiento de artículos (APC).
